No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Should the mention of ''Cybertron'' as the most recent incarnation of Transformers be replaced by ''Classics''? [[User:Amadeus|Amadeus]] 19:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | {{Cleanup|June 2007}} |
||
| − | :''Bugly is a [[Decepticon]] [[Pretender]] in the [[Generation 1]] [[continuity family]]. |
||
| − | Bugly is a [[Decepticon]] [[Pretender]], and a master of the obscure martial art of "Circuit-Su", which lets him throw lightning bolts. A strategist by function, Bugly wields two photon cannons in robot mode and transforms into a turbo-boosted hover jet. His Pretender shell, which resembles a humanoid insect, has an antenna on its head that delivers powerful electric shocks. Intense, mystical and very cruel in manner, Bugly is a deadly warrior whose vehicle mode has pinpoint maneuverability in the air. |
||
| − | ==Fiction== |
||
| − | ===Marvel Comics=== |
||
| − | ===IDW Comics=== |
||
| + | I went ahead and changed it from ''[[Cybertron]]'' to ''[[Classics]]''. [[User:Amadeus|Amadeus]] 19:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
| − | ==External Links== |
||
| − | * [http://www.tfu.info/1988/Decepticon/Bugly/bugly.htm Bugly at TFU.info] |
||
| + | :I'm going to change it to the movie line, but do we really want to have to constantly update this? Maybe it should be removed altogether. |
||
| − | {{stub}} |
||
| + | :Also, I daresay this is no longer a stub. --[[User:Sntint|Sntint]] 06:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
| − | [[Category:Decepticons]] |
||
| + | |||
| − | [[Category:Pretenders]] |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Split Species / Toyline? == |
||
| + | |||
| + | Just wondering if there was support for splitting this into two articles "Transformers (species)" and "Transformers (toyline)" or if folks prefered it as the one joint article? [[User:ZacWilliam|ZacWilliam]] 14:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :I support a split. Although "toyline" isn't the right word... and neither is franchise. They both already have established meanings in our nomenclature. "Brand" would probably be best. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 15:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :: "Brand" seems to be the word Hasbro uses. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 19:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | I'm sorry... did you just say the Transformers aren't robots? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 21:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
| + | : Uh, yeah. Mr. IP Address, aren't the tagline "robots in diguise", the term "robot mode", and four whole lines referring to the Transformers as robots right in their titles enough to convince you that's what they are? --[[User:Rotty|Rotty]] 21:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:23, 2 June 2007
Should the mention of Cybertron as the most recent incarnation of Transformers be replaced by Classics? Amadeus 19:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I went ahead and changed it from Cybertron to Classics. Amadeus 19:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm going to change it to the movie line, but do we really want to have to constantly update this? Maybe it should be removed altogether.
- Also, I daresay this is no longer a stub. --Sntint 06:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Split Species / Toyline?
Just wondering if there was support for splitting this into two articles "Transformers (species)" and "Transformers (toyline)" or if folks prefered it as the one joint article? ZacWilliam 14:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- I support a split. Although "toyline" isn't the right word... and neither is franchise. They both already have established meanings in our nomenclature. "Brand" would probably be best. --Steve-o 15:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- "Brand" seems to be the word Hasbro uses. --M Sipher 19:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry... did you just say the Transformers aren't robots? -Derik 21:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Uh, yeah. Mr. IP Address, aren't the tagline "robots in diguise", the term "robot mode", and four whole lines referring to the Transformers as robots right in their titles enough to convince you that's what they are? --Rotty 21:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)